Superintendent Lawsky to Leave the NYDFS and Start Consulting Business; Cato Institute Cries Foul

Bitcoin Magazine
Superintendent Lawsky to Leave the NYDFS and Start Consulting Business; Cato Institute Cries Foul

The Wall Street Journal reports that Benjamin Lawsky, the superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) who is expected to issue this month a new regulation for digital currency businesses called BitLicense, which has been widely criticized for being unnecessarily strict, will leave the NYDFS in June.

Lawsky said that he will form a consulting business that will include virtual currency advisory services. “[Lawsky] plans to advise companies on financial matters such as cybersecurity and digital currencies like bitcoin, a new sphere of regulation he helped spearhead in New York,” reports the New York Post.

In a recent Medium post titled “How to Prevent New York from Becoming the Bitcoin Backwater of the U.S.,” MIT Digital Currency Initiative lead Brian Forde issued a clear warning that the current BitLicense text has fundamental flaws. The Bitcoin policy think tank Coin Center expressed similar concerns.

The Wall Street Journal notes that Lawsky’s rules, likely to be released next week, could hinder innovation among small tech startups with limited resources by imposing too-high compliance costs.

In particular, according to the MIT Digital Currency Initiative analysis, Bitcoin companies would be required to get both a money transmitter license and a BitLicense  —  even though the two licenses have substantial overlapping requirements. Furthermore, compliance with BitLicense would be required for operations that don’t control customers’ funds, and even for software development work.

The Cato Institute, a public policy research organization with a libertarian orientation, bluntly denounces Lawsky’s move.

“[If] history is any guide, Ben Lawsky will be able to use the name he made attacking Bitcoin to wend his way into the Bitcoin business world,” notes Cato Senior Fellow Tim Harper. “Because of the contacts he made as a regulator, he can hire himself out to Bitcoin companies wanting to signal to other regulators that they have the approval of the regulatory establishment.”

According to Harper, Lawsky’s office violated New York’s Freedom of Information Law by refusing to release the research and analysis that it claimed to have done to validate the BitLicense regulation, and framed the regulatory discussion in a way that other regulators have felt obliged to copy.

Without speculating on whether Cato’s concerns are applicable in this specific case, it is worth noting that it wouldn’t be the first time that artificial, unnecessary strict restrictions and barriers to new businesses are put in place by regulators who hope to cash in later by helping struggling firms work around their own regulations.

In his commentary to the proposed BitLicense, Harper argues that poorly formed government regulation that impedes Bitcoin’s adoption will thwart badly needed global economic progress.

“The ‘BitLicense’ proposal does not meet those high standards,” says Harper. “The evidence that it will produce net benefits is weak, and the likelihood that it will have greater costs than benefits is high.”

The Cato Institute suggests that the Bitcoin community should refuse to do business with firms that hire Lawsky as a consultant or adviser, and hold regulators to account even after they’ve left office to make sure that regulators don’t thwart financial innovation hoping to profit after they leave office.

The post Superintendent Lawsky to Leave the NYDFS and Start Consulting Business; Cato Institute Cries Foul appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

CANADA’s First Fintech and Banking Innovation Conference is Coming to Vancouver

On June 3, 2015, Vancouver, British Columbia, will host “Digital Finance 2015,” Canada’s first fintech and banking innovation conference, at the Vancouver Club on West Hastings in the city’s trendy West End.

Digital Finance 2015 will feature two keynote speakers:

Peter Vander Auwera, co-founder of Innotribe innovation will talk about “Innovation in banking: from tactics to strategy.”

Sam Maule, emerging payments expert with Carlisle & Gallagher, and one of the “top innovation influencers” will talk about “FinTech’s Disruptive Force in Banking.“

Other speakers include representatives from Canada’s Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), Citi (New York), and Overstock (New York).

White Paper on Women in Fintech will be released

Organizer Christine Duhaime of the Digital Finance Institute is one of the authors of the “White Paper on PowerWomen in FinTech,” a study that highlights women’s contributions to developing financial technologies for financial services.

The Digital Finance Institute partnered with Innotribe and Carlisle & Gallagher Management Consultants to gather data from around the globe on how women are playing a role in the development and adoption of new financial technologies, particularly cryptocurrencies.

Christine Duhaime is a lawyer and an author and speaker in Toronto and Vancouver. She is a counterterrorist financing and anti-money laundering legal specialist with expertise in financial regulation, digital financial services and products, terrorist financing, bribery and money-laundering law.

“The ‘White Paper on PowerWomen in FinTech’ is the culmination of months of research and an important milestone in the industry globally,” Duhaime said. “We wanted to honor many of the incredible and impactful women in fintech by releasing the whitepaper at Digital Finance 2015.”

Ambitious Agenda Covers a Wide Range of Issues

The conference is targeted mainly at venture capital firms, banks, innovation labs, entrepreneurs, financial technology companies, AML-compliance teams, digital currency companies, payment processors and government regulators.

“By launching Canada’s first fintech conference, our aim is to be the catalyst for venture capital and other key investments and partnerships to move the industry forward in Canada and foster growth of fintech and innovation in emerging and disruptive payments,” says Duhaime.

The conference will cover a wide range of topics, including the future of money, new financial models, bank innovation, blockchain technology, Bitcoin, anti-money laundering, and payment solutions for disaster relief.

Digital Finance Institute

Duhaime is executive director and founder of the Digital Finance Institute. It was founded in 2014 as the first Canadian institute devoted to fintech, financial innovation and financial inclusion.

Because there has been so much interest in this conference, the institute will hold a similar conference in Toronto in November 2015 and has already lined up a speaker from The Wall Street Journal.

“The conference is rewarding for me because it’s the culmination of a number of goals I wanted to accomplish in fintech after I was the only woman speaking at my first Bitcoin conference in 2013, which is to highlight women in fintech and to encourage innovation in Canada,” says Duhaime.

The post CANADA’s First Fintech and Banking Innovation Conference is Coming to Vancouver appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

An Analysis of the Ripple Labs FinCEN Enforcement Action

This is a guest post by Joe Ciccolo, DCC Member and CEO of BitAML.


 The Ripple Labs settlement agreement, the first civil enforcement action brought against a digital currency exchange, demonstrates the perils of piecemeal AML compliance and delayed implementation. Last week, Ripple Labs, the popular payment system, currency exchange and remittance network, reached a settlement with FinCEN and the US DOJ in which it acknowledged AML compliance violations and agreed to fines in excess of $1.1 million. And that’s just the beginning. (More on the true financial and operational cost to Ripple Labs in a moment.) So what happened? And how can we learn from this enforcement action?


When Ripple Labs began blazing its trail in the world of digital currency, there were no true “rules of engagement”, and certainly nothing in the way of the AML compliance requirements that exist today. In fact, its founding predated the March 18, 2013 FinCEN guidance which applied Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations to digital currency exchanges and administrators by defining them as money transmitters, a type of money services business (MSB). As detailed in the settlement agreement, Ripple Labs did not immediately register its already existing business with FinCEN when the guidance was issued. Rather, they ultimately registered a subsidiary later that same year. Thus, the company operated an unregistered money services business (MSB). Simply put, this is one of the easiest violations for a regulator to prove. It is perhaps the lowest of the proverbial low hanging fruit.

Both prior and subsequent to registering as an MSB, regulators determined that Ripple Labs did not implement an effective BSA/AML program. (Note the italicized text added for emphasis.) Lest one think they can simply delay BSA/AML compliance by postponing FinCEN MSB registration, regulators reminded digital currency entities in the settlement agreement that “…regardless of whether they have registered, as required, MSBs are subject to certain additional requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations.” So bottom line…if you’re operational, you must have an effective BSA/AML program already in place. Waiting until you reach some predetermined company milestone before building out compliance functionality is not only a regulatory violation, as FinCEN and the US DOJ proved, but a very costly business strategy.

Equally damning is the idea of cobbling together bits and pieces of your compliance program as you grow. Digital currency exchanges and administrators must be strategic and very deliberate about investments in the area of compliance. While it’s a tall order to be sure, especially for a startup or small venture, the single best approach is to lay the foundation of your program using the “four pillars” of BSA/AML compliance (1. Designation of a Compliance Officer; 2. Development of internal policies, procedures and controls; 3. Ongoing, relevant training of employees; and, 4. Independent testing and review). With few exceptions, any investments you make in the area of compliance will fall into one or more of these four buckets. The importance of developing and investing in the vitality of the four pillars cannot be understated. Within the settlement itself, regulators took the opportunity to remind digital currency exchanges and administrators that they are required to implement an AML program that, at minimum, contains each of the four pillars. While investments in compliance – a non-revenue generating function of one’s business – may seem costly, the cost of not developing and effectively implementing a strategic approach from day one is exponentially higher.

Recall earlier in this article, I alluded to the $1.1 million aggregate fine as only the beginning of the true cost. Now the real work begins! In “Attachment B: Remedial Framework”, the settlement agreement provides a detailed list of cumbersome, time-sensitive requirements and deliverables that must be turned over on an extremely tight schedule. Among these, Ripple Labs must create and implement a training program; secure an independent party to review its AML program; enhance its protocol; implement transaction monitoring systems; and, perform a “look back” for potential suspicious activity. Further, not captured in the resource cost of remediating these items is the potential loss of revenue from new or existing customers that may question their faith in the company or losses attributable to engaging regulators rather than the marketplace. Moreover, business will now be conducted on the regulator’s terms, not the company’s terms. As you may well grasp from the partial list of required remedial fixes and indirect costs, the monetary penalty is only the beginning of the financial and operational pain.

The news, however, is not all bad. In fact, regulators devoted several detailed sentences at the very beginning of the settlement agreement to applauding Ripple Labs’ cooperation and commitment to maintaining an effective AML program. This was not by accident, nor should it be overlooked. When determining monetary fines and other forfeitures, regulators generally take into consideration the level of cooperation; self-disclosures made upfront; and, past violations, if any. The acknowledgement of these proactive efforts was just as much a call to shape future interactions with other digital currency exchanges and administrators, as it was a recognition of Ripple Labs’ progress and initiative.


The settlement agreement between regulators and Ripple Labs, the first civil enforcement action against any digital currency exchange, offers a valuable learning opportunity. The speed of innovation and marketplace disruption have never met a countering forcing quite like financial regulation. Digital currency exchanges and administrators have had to make changes while in motion. Some have been forced to suspend services (temporarily or indefinitely), while others still have struggled to adapt to a system of regulation that never really seems to fit quite right. Regardless of your past experiences or current circumstances, regulation is here to stay. The Ripple Labs settlement illustrates the importance of executing a comprehensive and cohesive AML compliance strategy that begins on day one of operations. It also teaches us that proactively mending previous regulatory transgressions, owning up to compliance faults, and pursuing a course of action to make thing right can soften the blow. So, if you haven’t already begun to invest time and resources into the build out of your AML compliance program, today is the day to get started. For those that have begun, it’s imperative that you move forward by staying on top of developments in the compliance world and never look back.

The Ripple Labs settlement must be embraced as a learning opportunity. It’s just a shame that this promising venture will be held back from advancing the pace of innovation in our industry due to early AML compliance missteps.

Learn more about Joe Ciccolo, CEO of BitAML at his DCC Member Profile.

The post An Analysis of the Ripple Labs FinCEN Enforcement Action appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.